Critical analysis essay draft

Masuma Begum

Literature FIQWS 10005 HSK1 and FIQWS 10105 HSK1-Killer Writing

Professor G.D. Peters and Professor Metenko 

Critical analysis essay-Cask of Amontillado by Edgar Allen Poe 

10/18/21

 

                                          Review of The Cask Of Amontillado

           

 

                Throughout Edgar Allen Poe’s stories, it discusses themes from death, to regret, and romantic tragedy. One story in particular, is the short story, “The Cask of Amontillado”. This short story discusses how the two characters, Montresor and Fortunato, represent the old and the new hierarchy. Montresor is the old hierarchy, since his wealth was dated back to many generations within his family. On the other hand, Fortunato is the new hierarchy, as his status grew higher, by being able to bring himself up the social ladder. As the new social status gets higher, the previous social status loses their wealth. Due to that, Montresor sees this as a threat. To eliminate the source of his misery, he decides that Fortunato must die. Therefore, I agree that even though the reason for Montresor to murder Fortunato may be related to an “insult”, there may be other factors, as society plays a role on how they created an environment for the murder of Fortunato to take place. 

 

             In a society like Montresor and Fortunato, people’s lives are shaped by the social hierarchy that they are part of. Especially when it’s aristocracy. In the past, social hierarchies were led by family lineage. In the present, it is now led by becoming wealthy on your own. Based on your social status, people may treat you differently. For instance, according to Baraban, “Since a rich and powerful man such as Fortunato cannot remember Montresor’s insignia, it is logical to assume that Montresor was not an active  participant in the local life of the aristocracy” (Baraban).  By not knowing that Montresor had an aristocratic lineage, he believes that due to his newfound status of being wealthy, he is powerful. No one can disrespect him, but he can choose how he treats people. This led him to look down on Montresor without thinking about his consequences. Hence, it led to Montresor wanting to seek revenge on him, as a way to restore his honor that he holds onto through his lineage. 

 

            However, even as society  may treat a person differently based on their social class, that person may want to stick to their traditional values. To illustrate, Fortunato recognizes Montresor’s wealth when he sees that the “catacombs of Montresors are extensive and their vastness genuinely impresses Fortunato. In the catacombs surrounded by the remains of Montresor’s ancestors, Fortunato realizes how powerful this family used to be” (Baraban). Overall, by showing Fortunato his catacombs, Montresor is going by his family motto “no one insults me with impunity.” This brings Fortunato’s guard around Montresor down, as he sees that his enemy is more powerful than he thought he, himself is. By bringing on his vengeance against his enemy, Montresor has eliminated the person who he fears may take advantage of him. It may represent the old social hierarchy going against the new social hierarchy, as a way to preserve their honor. 

 

               Furthermore, by seeing the relationship between Fortunato and Montresor, it shows that these two characters represent the old rich and the new rich in their changing society. The old rich represent the old society, which determines a person’s status through their lineage. If a person is a born aristocrat, then they have the advantages while the person who is born into a lower class are disadvantaged. The new rich represents the new society that allows a person to move up from being poor to rich through their efforts and hardwork. This shows that the social status may change, which gives the new rich an advantage over the old rich. The old rich lose everything and may be reduced to being less aristocratic while the new rich are given a much higher status. As a result, it can create disparities and resentment. By seeing Montresor’s actions that he committed against Fortunato, we can see that the old society is challenging the new society. 

 

              If the chosen “new aristocrat” class is chosen over the “old aristocrat” class, then it becomes a  threat to those who had their wealth before the new aristocrats. Even though it has been threatened, both the new aristocrat and the old aristocrat still made their way up into higher status, through hard work. However, there are some differences. The old rich could not make money as the new generation of wealthy people have made, as they live off of inheritance. The new rich have made money that are able to sustain their wealth. It creates a gap, as both sides got their wealths differently. The new aristocrats are the current aristocrats that are new to the life of luxury while the old aristocrats are used to living in luxury. As a result, the attention, respect, honor, and dignity are given to the new aristocrats. Mainly, you would see the old aristocrat getting more respect while the new aristocrats are looked down on. Hence, even though these new and old aristocrats are still rich and powerful, they don’t relate to one another based on how their wealths is seen. 

 

           By gaining wealth, a person can become more powerful than the previous aristocrats. As shown in “The Cask of Amontillado”, there were different groups that came. Consequently, it created a new social class, since these groups were working hard enough for their wealth and status to go up. To lose everything, Montreaor noted that “—this Fortunato—although in other regards, he was a man to be respected and even feared. He prided himself in his connoisseurship in his wine. Few Italians have true virtuoso spirits. For the most part, their enthusiasm is adopted to suit the time and opportunity, to practice their imposture upon the British and Austrian millionaires”(1). With the coming of millionaires and the newcomers, it creates a gap between the old and the new rich. This shows that the new rich becomes more powerful than the previous rich. They are given some special status and treatment, in contrast to the old rich. The new rich are considered more modern while the old rich are considered more traditional. 

 

                 In Montresor’s thoughts, he believes that your lineage determines your honor and pride. This foreshadows Fortunato’s death, as Montresor takes him to the catacomb to explore his ancestor’s treasures. This can be shown when Fortunato says “enough”, he said “the cough is a mere nothing; it will not kill me. I shall not die of a cough” (2). In response, Montresor says “True—true” I replied “and, indeed I had no intention of alarming you unnecessarily—but you should use all proper caution. A drought of Medoc will defend us from the damps” (2). It brings on the mysteriousness that Montresor had Fortunato’s murder all planned out. This is by taking advantage of Fortunato’s weakness, and using it against him, by being friendly with him. It brings his guard down, as he doesn’t suspect anything from Montresor through his drunken state. By killing Fortunato, Montresor feels that he has gained something out of it by having his honor restored. He can now take back what he has lost to Fortunato. 

   

              To explain, by having the newcomers arrive in Fortunato’s and Montresor’s society, they contributed to the society. The contributions that newcomers have made is by allowing the economy to advance. As a result, the people and the newcomers benefit from it. This can be presented when the Italian connoisseurs came to make their wine. They gained a lot from their hard work that they made their way up to aristocracy. On the other hand, there are people, who, like Montresor, had wealth and status through family lineage. Thus, they are supposed to have an advantage over the newly rich. But, in the case of this short story, it was the other way around. The new rich have much more advantages and power while the old rich are left out, since society is used to them. Consequently, Montresor found this unfair as his ancestors were there before them. That is the reason why Montresor thought that murdering Fortunato out of revenge, was led by the way society favored their new rich. 

 

          To summarize, although Montresor’s motive for murdering Fortunato has something to do with the insult that he said to him, his other motive is that he has lost everything because of this “new aristocracy”. He felt that by doing the actions that he did, he wouldn’t feel apologetic about it, due to feeling like he had completed his work. It is as if he had taken back everything that Fortunato once had, as a way to prove to himself that no one is allowed to outdo him. No one is allowed to insult him or disrespect him because everything that he once had belongs to him. He must continue and pick up from where his ancestors started and ended, since he is the head of his own wealth. His wealth and social status as an aristocrat, is his own pride. To challenge that, means to challenge him, which is shown through Fortunato’s action of insulting Montresor. 

     

                 Overall, by having another motive to murder Fortunato, Montresor got what he wanted and is able to complete his task. However, this doesn’t change the social class system that was already implemented. This shows that by being in this environment, Montresor felt that he was at a disadvantage. By being burdened by what he has already lost, he can never get it back. The only treasure that is left with him are his ancestor’s wealth, the catacombs, and his lineage. It represents that he inherited the wealth. As for Fortunato, he has worked hard for his wealth and brought his way up to become an aristocrat. He has been lucky enough to gain his new status, power, and wealth. However, the irony shown in this story is that Fortunato is not as fortunate due to showing his weakness, which is looking down on Montresor and insulting him. In return, this results in his death while Montresor gets away with his own crime. The structure of their society has out them in this dilemma against each other. 

    

 

 

 

  Bibliography 

    

      Baraban, Elena V. “The Motive for Murder in ‘The Cask of Amontillado’ by Edgar Allan Poe.” Rocky Mountain Review (Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association), vol. 58, no. 2, 2004, p. 47–.

 

      Poe, Allen Edgar. “The Cask of Amontillado”.1809-1849